回忆1：
大作文 ever-increaing of population 十五岁以下 对现在和未来的影响
小作文monthly的布里斯班和堪培拉的线图日均最高最低温度+柱状图日均下雨天
回忆2：
Figures show that in some countries, there is an ever-increasing proportion of population aged 15 or younger. What do you think the effect of current and future in those countries.
回忆3：
L1 一个女孩要租一个bday party场地，给了几个酒店 L2 去hiking的注意事项，itinerary L3两个人讨论他们的presentation，跟oil相关 new zealand 还提到了电动车 L4 一个跟专利有关的职业
回忆4：
R1农民们生产农作物，英国的农作物对环境的问题 R2 在古埃及壁画上发现当时人们海运，科学家们的探讨 R3人们对科学的看法，科学术语，如何提高大众对科学解释的认知。
回忆5：
听力
Section1 酒店预订晚会
1-10) completion
1.35
2.Saturdays
3.Limerick
4.business area
5.5th floor
6.view
7.a week
8.Gym
9.65%
10. 044298611
Section2 南美旅行回忆和路线
11-15) multiple choices
11. C valuable for South America trip for a second time
12. C when you first meet tour leaders
13. A water
14. A.in the land
15.A after consulted the tour guide
16-20) matching
16. D by plane
17. C by car
18. G by donkey
19. A by minivan
20. E by train
Section 3 两学校负责人之间的对话
21-26) matching
21. A too many people
22. C repetitive information
23. H time consuming
24. F well organized
25. E inefficient information
26. D no opportunity
27-28) B oil rig damage to Sea bed
C fir for potential students
29-30) challenging experts' opinion concerns
sources of information
Section 4 专利相关的律师岗位介绍
31-40) completions
31.company
32.originality
33. description
34. engineering
35. communication
36. languages
37. salary
38. lonely
39. industrial
40. government
回忆6：
阅读
P1 英国农业
P2 古埃及壁画
P3 科学的交流 communication in science
communication in science
A
Science plays an increasingly significantrole in people’s lives,making the faithful communication of scientific developments more importantthan ever. Yet such communication isfraught with challenges that can easily distort discussions, leading tounnecessary confusion and misunderstandings.
B
Some problems stem from the esoteric natureof current research and the associated difficulty of finding sufficientlyfaithful terminology ( 术语). Abstraction and complexity are not signs that a given scientificdirection is wrong, as some commentators have suggested, but are instead atribute to the success of human ingenuity in meeting the increasingly complexchallenges that nature presents. They can, however, make communication moredifficult. But many of the biggest challenges for science reporting arisebecause in areas of evolving research, scientists themselves often only partlyunderstand the full implications of any particular advance or development.Since that dynamic ( 动态的） applies to most of the scientific developments that directly affectpeople’s livesglobal warming, cancer research, diet studies—learning how to overcome it is critical to spurring ( 刺激，鼓励）a more informed scientific debateamong the broader public.
C
Ambiguous word choices are the source ofsome misunderstandings. Scientists often employ colloquial terminology, whichthey then assign a specific meaning thatis impossible to fathom ( 彻底理解)without proper training. The term “relativity,” for example, is intrinsically misleading. Many interpret the theoryto mean that everything is relative and there are no absolutes. Yet althoughthe measurements any observer makes depend on his coordinates and referenceframe, the physical phenomena he measures have an invariant description thattranscends that observer’s particular coordinates. Einstein’s theory of relativity is really about finding an invariantdescription of physical phenomena. True, Einstein agreed with the idea that histheory would have been better named “Invarianten theorie.“(【德】， 不变理论） But the term
“relativity” was already entrenched at the timefor him to change.测 机经
D
“Theuncertainty principle” is another frequently abused term. It is sometimes interpreted as alimitation on observers and their ability to make measurements.
E
But it is not about intrinsic limitationson any one particular measurement; it is about the inability to preciselymeasure particular pairs of quantities simultaneously? The first interpretationis perhaps more engaging from a philosophical or political perspective. It’s just not what the science isabout.
F
Even the word “theory” can be a problem. Unlike mostpeople, who use the word to describe a passing conjecture that they oftenregard as suspect, physicists have very specific ideas in mind when they talkabout theories. For physicists, theories entail a definite physical frameworkembodied in a set of fundamental assumptions about the world that lead to aspecific set of equations and predictions—ones that are borne out by successful predictions. Theories aren’t necessarily shown to be corrector complete immediately. Even Einstein took the better part of a decade todevelop the correct version of his theory of general relativity. But eventuallyboth the ideas and the measurements settle down and theories are either provencorrect, abandoned or absorbed into other, more encompassing theories.
G
“Globalwarming” is anotherexample of problematic terminology. Climatologists ( 气象学家） predict more drasticfluctuations in temperature and rainfall— not necessarily that every place will be warmer. The name sometimessubverts the debate, since it lets people argue that their winter was worse, sohow could there be global wanning? Clearly “global climate change” would have been a better name. But not all problems stem solely frompoor word choices. Some stem from the intrinsically complex nature of much of modernscience. Science sometimes transcends this limitation: remarkably, chemistswere able to detail the precise chemical processes involved in the destructionof the ozone layer, making the evidence that chlorofluorocarbon gases (Freon,for example) were destroying the ozone layer indisputable.
H
A better understanding of the mathematicalsignificance of results and less insistence on a simple story would help toclarify (澄清) manyscientific discussions. For several months, Harvard was tortured months,Harvard was tortured by empty debates over the relative intrinsic scientificabilities of men and women. One of the more amusing aspects of the discussionwas that those who believed in the differences and those who didn’t used the same evidence aboutgender-specific special ability. How could that be? The answer is that the datashows no substantial effects. Social factors might account for these tiny differences,which in any case have an unclear connection to scientific ability. Not much ofa headline when phrased that way, is it? Each type of science has its ownsource of complexity and potential for miscommunication. Yet there are steps wecan take to improve public understanding in all cases. The first would be toinculcate greater understanding and acceptance of indirect scientific evidence.The information from an unmanned space mission is no less legitimate than theinformation from one in which people are on board.
I
This doesn’t mean never questioning an interpretation, but it also doesn’t mean equating indirect evidencewith blind belief, as people sometimes suggest. Second, we might need differentstandards for evaluating science with urgent policy implications than researchwith purely theoretical value. When scientists say they are not certain abouttheir predictions, it doesn’t necessarily mean they’ve found nothing substantial. It would be better if scientists were moreopen about the mathematical significance of their results and if the publicdidn’t treat mathas quite so scary; statistics and errors, which tell us the uncertainty in ameasurement, give us the tools to evaluate new developments
fairly.
J
But most important, people have torecognize that science can be complex. If we accept only simple stories, thedescription will necessarily be distorted. When advances are subtle orcomplicated, scientists should be willing to go the extra distance to giveproper explanations and the public should be more patient about the truth. Evenso, some difficulties are unavoidable. Most
developments reflect work in progress, sothe story is complex because no one yet knows the big picture.
答案：
版本二：
回忆7：
听力
S1 电话预定酒店（举办party）
1-10填空题：
1. Location: On the 5th Floor
2. Bright with good view
3. Minimum number of people: 35
4. Time: any Saturday available
5 .Name of Hotel: Limerit Hotel
6.with a Hall on ground floor
7.Time period: One week
8.65%
9. Phone No: 04498611
10．至少有多少人必须参加：30
S2 旅游介绍
1针对想再去一次的人 2bring water 3在meet leader时出示 4不想带的东西放在hotel里(因为更cheap)5可以给local people medicine 但是要经过leader同意 6 by flight，书是适合还要再去的人，保险要在跟导游见面时提供，行李，我选 的Hotel，路上要带水，首先飞机，然后车，然后Minivan，然后左边bus, 右边火车
S3 海洋研究所实习考察讨论
21. ecologist – A too many people
22. dinner presentation – C repetitive information
23. journal writing – H time consuming
24. field work – F well organized
25. data analysis – E inefficient information
26. briefing after lunch – D no opportunity
27~28 多选题
Why do they choose the topic?
B. oil rig damage to sea bed
C. good for potential students
29~30 多选题
Presentation should cover:
A. challenging experts’ opinion concerns
C. source of information
S4 专利律师
回忆8：
回忆9：
回忆10：
为更好地促进做好Edward艾华师最新预测,请烤鸭们积极回忆在本文下面评论栏目里面,请尽量详细,并标明城市考点,A/G类,听力,阅读,大小作文,谢谢！特请亚太其他国家,欧洲,北美,南美,非洲等其他考区的烤鸭们也积极回忆吧
特别提醒：雅思考试20多年来，有非常严格的规律性和出题思路。全世界有6大考区，而只有一个剑桥考试中心几个人在出题，每个考区一周平均要出一份考卷，一个月出24份考卷，考官如何保证达到难度一样呢，如何保证新题难度、准确度和评价机制公平呢，所以只能是20年来的题库旧题目的有效组合，新题不能超出5-10%,每份雅思卷子都是95%-99%以上旧题原题真题。多年雅思考官和专家Edward老师非常熟悉雅思出题规律和听说读写题库出题组合卷子的秘诀，IPN资料因此而诞生！具体请阅读http://bbs.ieltstofelglobal.com/thread-32-1-1.html
